BLAIR, EX PARTE, 304 U.S. 579 (1938)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BLAIR, EX PARTE, 304 U.S. 579 (1938)

304 U.S. 579

Ex parte Harry M. BLAIR, petitioner.*
No. 22
, original.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1938

Messrs. George Pfeil, of New York City, Poffenbarger & Poffenbarger, of Charleston, W. Va., and John Levi Clark of New York City, for petitioners.

For opinion below, see 95 F.2d 995.

The motion to deter consideration is denied. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is denied.

Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

* Rehearing denied 59 S.Ct. 55, 83 L.Ed. --.


U.S. Supreme Court

BLAIR, EX PARTE, 304 U.S. 579 (1938)

304 U.S. 579

Ex parte Harry M. BLAIR, petitioner.*
No. 22
, original.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1938

Messrs. George Pfeil, of New York City, Poffenbarger & Poffenbarger, of Charleston, W. Va., and John Levi Clark of New York City, for petitioners.

For opinion below, see 95 F.2d 995.

The motion to deter consideration is denied. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is denied.

Mr. Justice Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.

* Rehearing denied 59 S.Ct. 55, 83 L.Ed. --.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.