TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO v. WILBUR, 304 U.S. 544 (1938)
U.S. Supreme Court
TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO v. WILBUR, 304 U.S. 544 (1938)
304 U.S. 544
The TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO, petitioner,
v.
Rollin A. WILBUR and the National City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, Cotrustees, etc.*
No. 215.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 16, 1938
Mr. Herbert S. Duffy, of Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.
On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as it appears upon argument that the judgment sought to be reviewed rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 33, 304 S., 37 S. Ct. 643; Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33 S., 44 S. Ct. 432, 433; Lynch v. State of New York, 293 U.S. 52, 54, 55 S., 55 S. Ct. 16, 17.
* Rehearing denied 59 S. Ct. 65, 83 L.Ed. --.[ Tax Commission of Ohio v. Wilbur 304 U.S. 544 (1938) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO v. WILBUR, 304 U.S. 544 (1938)
The TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO, petitioner,
v.
Rollin A. WILBUR and the National City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, Cotrustees, etc.*
No. 215.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 16, 1938
Mr. Herbert S. Duffy, of Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.
On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio.
PER CURIAM.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as it appears upon argument that the judgment sought to be reviewed rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 33, 304 S., 37 S. Ct. 643; Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33 S., 44 S. Ct. 432, 433; Lynch v. State of New York, 293 U.S. 52, 54, 55 S., 55 S. Ct. 16, 17.
* Rehearing denied 59 S. Ct. 65, 83 L.Ed. --.[ Tax Commission of Ohio v. Wilbur 304 U.S. 544 (1938) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.