TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO v. WILBUR, 304 U.S. 544 (1938)

U.S. Supreme Court

TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO v. WILBUR, 304 U.S. 544 (1938)

304 U.S. 544

The TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO, petitioner,
v.
Rollin A. WILBUR and the National City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, Cotrustees, etc.*
No. 215.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 16, 1938

Mr. Herbert S. Duffy, of Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.

On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as it appears upon argument that the judgment sought to be reviewed rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 33, 304 S., 37 S. Ct. 643; Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33 S., 44 S. Ct. 432, 433; Lynch v. State of New York, 293 U.S. 52, 54, 55 S., 55 S. Ct. 16, 17.

* Rehearing denied 59 S. Ct. 65, 83 L.Ed. --.[ Tax Commission of Ohio v. Wilbur 304 U.S. 544 (1938) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO v. WILBUR, 304 U.S. 544 (1938)

 304 U.S. 544

The TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO, petitioner,
v.
Rollin A. WILBUR and the National City Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, Cotrustees, etc.*
No. 215.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 16, 1938

Mr. Herbert S. Duffy, of Columbus, Ohio, for petitioner.

On writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga County, State of Ohio.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as it appears upon argument that the judgment sought to be reviewed rests upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 33, 304 S., 37 S. Ct. 643; Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U.S. 30, 32, 33 S., 44 S. Ct. 432, 433; Lynch v. State of New York, 293 U.S. 52, 54, 55 S., 55 S. Ct. 16, 17.

* Rehearing denied 59 S. Ct. 65, 83 L.Ed. --.[ Tax Commission of Ohio v. Wilbur 304 U.S. 544 (1938) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.