KELLOGG CO. v. NATIONAL BISCUIT CO, 302 U.S. 777 (1937)

U.S. Supreme Court

KELLOGG CO. v. NATIONAL BISCUIT CO, 302 U.S. 777 (1937)

302 U.S. 777

KELLOGG COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL BISCUIT COMPANY.*
No. 396.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1937

Messrs. W. H. Crichton Clarke and Edward S. Rogers, both of New York City, and Robert T. McCracken, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Messrs. Thomas C. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., David A. Reed, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Drury W. Cooper and Charles A. Vilas, both of New York City, for respondent.

For opinion below, see (C.C.A.) 91 F.(2d) 150.

Petition for rehearing denied.

* Motion denied 302 U.S. 654, 58 S.Ct. 280, 82 L.Ed. --. Second petition for rehearing granted 304 U.S. 586, 58 S.Ct. 1052, 82 L.Ed. --.[ Kellogg Co v. National Biscuit Co 302 U.S. 777 (1937) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

KELLOGG CO. v. NATIONAL BISCUIT CO, 302 U.S. 777 (1937)

302 U.S. 777

KELLOGG COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL BISCUIT COMPANY.*
No. 396.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1937

Messrs. W. H. Crichton Clarke and Edward S. Rogers, both of New York City, and Robert T. McCracken, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Messrs. Thomas C. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., David A. Reed, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Drury W. Cooper and Charles A. Vilas, both of New York City, for respondent.

For opinion below, see (C.C.A.) 91 F.(2d) 150.

Petition for rehearing denied.

* Motion denied 302 U.S. 654, 58 S.Ct. 280, 82 L.Ed. --. Second petition for rehearing granted 304 U.S. 586, 58 S.Ct. 1052, 82 L.Ed. --.[ Kellogg Co v. National Biscuit Co 302 U.S. 777 (1937) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.