IOWA CITY LIGHT & POWER CO. v. ICKES, 302 U.S. 769 (1937)
U.S. Supreme Court
IOWA CITY LIGHT & POWER CO. v. ICKES, 302 U.S. 769 (1937)
302 U.S. 769
IOWA CITY LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
Harold L. ICKES, as Federal Emergency Administrator of Public Works, et al.
No. 86.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 4, 1937
Messrs. Walter B. Guy, of Washington, D. C., and Wayne G. Cook, of Davenport, Iowa, for petitioner.
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
For opinion below, see Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 91 F.(2d) 303.
Pursuant to a stipulation of counsel the decree of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court of the United States for the District of Colubmia with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot.
U.S. Supreme Court
IOWA CITY LIGHT & POWER CO. v. ICKES, 302 U.S. 769 (1937)
IOWA CITY LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
Harold L. ICKES, as Federal Emergency Administrator of Public Works, et al.
No. 86.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 4, 1937
Messrs. Walter B. Guy, of Washington, D. C., and Wayne G. Cook, of Davenport, Iowa, for petitioner.
On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
For opinion below, see Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, 91 F.(2d) 303.
Pursuant to a stipulation of counsel the decree of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court of the United States for the District of Colubmia with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.