ODELL v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL CO, 302 U.S. 756 (1937)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

ODELL v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL CO, 302 U.S. 756 (1937)

302 U.S. 756

Benjamin F. J. ODELL, petitioner,
v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY et al.*
No. 557.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 6, 1937

Mr. Benjamin F. J. Odell, of Chicago, Ill., pro se, for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 91 F.2d 359.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

* Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 780, 58 S.Ct. 408, 82 L.Ed. --.[ Odell v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co 302 U.S. 756 (1937) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

ODELL v. BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL CO, 302 U.S. 756 (1937)

302 U.S. 756

Benjamin F. J. ODELL, petitioner,
v.
BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL COMPANY et al.*
No. 557.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 6, 1937

Mr. Benjamin F. J. Odell, of Chicago, Ill., pro se, for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 91 F.2d 359.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.

* Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 780, 58 S.Ct. 408, 82 L.Ed. --.[ Odell v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co 302 U.S. 756 (1937) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.