U S EX REL SOCIETE DE CONDENSATION ET D'APPLICATIONS, 302 U.S. 721 (1937)

U.S. Supreme Court

U S EX REL SOCIETE DE CONDENSATION ET D'APPLICATIONS, 302 U.S. 721 (1937)

302 U.S. 721

UNITED STATES, ex relatione SOCIETE DE CONDENSATION ET D'APPLICATIONS MECHANIQUES, petitioner,
v.
Conway P. COE, Commissioner of Patents.*
No. 298.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1937

Messrs. Reeve Lewis and Philip Mauro, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 91 F.(2d) 238.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

* Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 776, 58 S.Ct. 136, 82 L.Ed. --. Second petition for rehearing denied 304 U.S. 589, 58 S.Ct. 1043, 82 L.Ed. --.[ U S ex rel Societe De Condensation et d'applications 302 U.S. 721 (1937) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

U S EX REL SOCIETE DE CONDENSATION ET D'APPLICATIONS, 302 U.S. 721 (1937)

302 U.S. 721

UNITED STATES, ex relatione SOCIETE DE CONDENSATION ET D'APPLICATIONS MECHANIQUES, petitioner,
v.
Conway P. COE, Commissioner of Patents.*
No. 298.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1937

Messrs. Reeve Lewis and Philip Mauro, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 91 F.(2d) 238.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

* Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 776, 58 S.Ct. 136, 82 L.Ed. --. Second petition for rehearing denied 304 U.S. 589, 58 S.Ct. 1043, 82 L.Ed. --.[ U S ex rel Societe De Condensation et d'applications 302 U.S. 721 (1937) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.