CARLSON v. KESLER, 302 U.S. 639 (1937)

U.S. Supreme Court

CARLSON v. KESLER, 302 U.S. 639 (1937)

302 U.S. 639

Lawrence E. CARLSON, Administrator of the Estate of William E, Koch, deceased, appellant,
v.
Lloyd KESLER, Harry Kesler, Also known as Harry E. Kesler, Partners, etc., et al.
No. 373.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1937

Mr. Howard F. Bishop, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

For opinions below, see 198 N.E. 451; 199 N.E. 889.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237(a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937 (28 U. S.C.A. 344(a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, as required by section 237(c), Judicial Code, as amended, 43 Stat. 936, 938 (28 U.S.C.A. 344(c), certiorari is denied.


U.S. Supreme Court

CARLSON v. KESLER, 302 U.S. 639 (1937)

302 U.S. 639

Lawrence E. CARLSON, Administrator of the Estate of William E, Koch, deceased, appellant,
v.
Lloyd KESLER, Harry Kesler, Also known as Harry E. Kesler, Partners, etc., et al.
No. 373.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1937

Mr. Howard F. Bishop, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

For opinions below, see 198 N.E. 451; 199 N.E. 889.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237(a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937 (28 U. S.C.A. 344(a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, as required by section 237(c), Judicial Code, as amended, 43 Stat. 936, 938 (28 U.S.C.A. 344(c), certiorari is denied.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.