HALL v. UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO, 296 U.S. 621 (1935)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

HALL v. UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO, 296 U.S. 621 (1935)

296 U.S. 621

Holmes HALL, petitioner,
v.
UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY et al.*
No. 390.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 14, 1935

Messrs. Donald W. Johnson and Charles V. Garnett, both of Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 76 F.(2d) 258.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

* Rehearing denied 296 U.S. 663, 56 S. Ct. 169.[ Hall v. Universal Oil Products Co 296 U.S. 621 (1935) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

HALL v. UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS CO, 296 U.S. 621 (1935)

296 U.S. 621

Holmes HALL, petitioner,
v.
UNIVERSAL OIL PRODUCTS COMPANY et al.*
No. 390.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 14, 1935

Messrs. Donald W. Johnson and Charles V. Garnett, both of Kansas City, Mo., for petitioner.

For opinion below, see 76 F.(2d) 258.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

* Rehearing denied 296 U.S. 663, 56 S. Ct. 169.[ Hall v. Universal Oil Products Co 296 U.S. 621 (1935) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.