TRIPLETT v. LOWELL, 296 U.S. 570 (1935)

U.S. Supreme Court

TRIPLETT v. LOWELL, 296 U.S. 570 (1935)

296 U.S. 570

A. G. TRIPLETT et al., petitioners,
v.
Percival D. LOWELL.
No. 388.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 9, 1935

Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Cook & Markell, of Baltimore, Md., for petitioners.

Messrs. Clifton V. Edwards, of New York City, Gaylord Lee Clark, of Baltimore, Md., and John B. Brady, of Washington, D. C., for respondents.

For opinion below, see 77 F.(2d) 556.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It is ordered that the petition for rehearing in this case be, and it hereby is, granted. The order heretofore entered on October 14, 1935, denying the petition for writ of certiorari in this case is vacated, and it is ordered that the petition for writ of certiorari be, and the same hereby is granted. The case is assigned for argument immediately following No. 590.


U.S. Supreme Court

TRIPLETT v. LOWELL, 296 U.S. 570 (1935)

 296 U.S. 570

A. G. TRIPLETT et al., petitioners,
v.
Percival D. LOWELL.
No. 388.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 9, 1935

Messrs. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Cook & Markell, of Baltimore, Md., for petitioners.

Messrs. Clifton V. Edwards, of New York City, Gaylord Lee Clark, of Baltimore, Md., and John B. Brady, of Washington, D. C., for respondents.

For opinion below, see 77 F.(2d) 556.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It is ordered that the petition for rehearing in this case be, and it hereby is, granted. The order heretofore entered on October 14, 1935, denying the petition for writ of certiorari in this case is vacated, and it is ordered that the petition for writ of certiorari be, and the same hereby is granted. The case is assigned for argument immediately following No. 590.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.