United States v. Kesterson, 296 U.S. 299 (1935)
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Kesterson, 296 U.S. 299 (1935)United States v. Kesterson
No. 46
Submitted November 14, 1935
Decided December 9, 1935
296 U.S. 299
Syllabus
Decided upon the authority of United States v. Constantine, ante p. 296 U. S. 287.
76 F.2d 913 affirmed.
Certiorari to review a judgment reversing convictions of respondents for carrying on a liquor business contrary to state law without having paid the tax imposed by § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926.
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Kesterson, 296 U.S. 299 (1935)United States v. Kesterson
No. 46
Submitted November 14, 1935
Decided December 9, 1935
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Decided upon the authority of United States v. Constantine, ante p. 296 U. S. 287.
76 F.2d 913 affirmed.
Certiorari to review a judgment reversing convictions of respondents for carrying on a liquor business contrary to state law without having paid the tax imposed by § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926.
MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case, like the case next preceding, involves the validity of § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed judgments of conviction under an indictment charging engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer contrary to the laws of Oklahoma on August 17, 1934. 8 F. Supp. 680, 76 F.2d 913.
For the reasons given in the opinion in No. 40, the judgment is
Affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS, MR. JUSTICE STONE, and MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CARDOZO's opinion in United States v. Constantine, ante, p. 296 U. S. 287.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.