Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman,
295 U.S. 654 (1935)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman, 295 U.S. 654 (1935)

Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman

No. 178

Argued December 6, 1934

Decided June 3, 1935.

295 U.S. 654



1. The right to trial by jury preserved by the Seventh Amendment is the right which existed under the English common law when the Amendment was adopted. P. 295 U. S. 657.

2. The Amendment not only preserves that right, but exhibits a studied purpose to protect it from indirect impairment through possible enlargements of the power of reexamination existing under the common law, and, to that end, declares that "no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law." P. 295 U. S. 657.

3. The aim of the Amendment is to preserve the substance of the common law right of trial by jury, as distinguished from mere matters of form or procedure, and particularly to retain the common law distinction between the province of the court and that of the jury, whereby, in the absence of express or implied consent to the contrary, issues of law are to be resolved by the court, and issues of fact are to be determined by the jury under appropriate instructions by the court. P. 295 U. S. 657.

Page 295 U. S. 655

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.