SPRUILL v. O'TOOLE, 294 U.S. 707 (1935)

U.S. Supreme Court

SPRUILL v. O'TOOLE, 294 U.S. 707 (1935)

294 U.S. 707

Georgia M. SPRUILL, petitioner,
v.
Mary O'TOOLE and Edgar C. Snyder.*
No. 637.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 21, 1935

Miss Georgia M. Spruill, pro se.

For opinion below, see 74 F.(2d) 559.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

* Rehearing denied 294 U.S. 732, 55 S. Ct. 510, 79 L. Ed. --.[ Spruill v. O'Toole 294 U.S. 707 (1935) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

SPRUILL v. O'TOOLE, 294 U.S. 707 (1935)

 294 U.S. 707

Georgia M. SPRUILL, petitioner,
v.
Mary O'TOOLE and Edgar C. Snyder.*
No. 637.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 21, 1935

Miss Georgia M. Spruill, pro se.

For opinion below, see 74 F.(2d) 559.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

* Rehearing denied 294 U.S. 732, 55 S. Ct. 510, 79 L. Ed. --.[ Spruill v. O'Toole 294 U.S. 707 (1935) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.