SPRUILL v. O'TOOLE, 294 U.S. 707 (1935)
U.S. Supreme Court
SPRUILL v. O'TOOLE, 294 U.S. 707 (1935)
294 U.S. 707
Georgia M. SPRUILL, petitioner,
v.
Mary O'TOOLE and Edgar C. Snyder.*
No. 637.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 21, 1935
Miss Georgia M. Spruill, pro se.
For opinion below, see 74 F.(2d) 559.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.
* Rehearing denied 294 U.S. 732, 55 S. Ct. 510, 79 L. Ed. --.[ Spruill v. O'Toole 294 U.S. 707 (1935) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
SPRUILL v. O'TOOLE, 294 U.S. 707 (1935)
Georgia M. SPRUILL, petitioner,
v.
Mary O'TOOLE and Edgar C. Snyder.*
No. 637.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 21, 1935
Miss Georgia M. Spruill, pro se.
For opinion below, see 74 F.(2d) 559.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds no ground upon which a writ of certiorari should be issued. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.
* Rehearing denied 294 U.S. 732, 55 S. Ct. 510, 79 L. Ed. --.[ Spruill v. O'Toole 294 U.S. 707 (1935) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
