Long v. Ansell,
293 U.S. 76 (1934)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Long v. Ansell, 293 U.S. 76 (1934)

Long v. Ansell

No. 18

Argued October 15, 1934

Decided November 5, 1934

293 U.S. 76


1. A Senator of the United States, while in the District of Columbia in attendance at a session of the Senate, is immune under Constitution, Art. I, § 6, cl. 1, from arrest in a civil case but not from the service of a summons. P. 293 U. S. 82.

2. This constitutional privilege must not be confused with the common law rule that witnesses, suitors, and their attorneys, while in attendance in connection with the conduct of one suit, are immune from service in another. P. 293 U. S. 83.

63 App.D.C. 68, 69 F.2d 386, affirmed.

Page 293 U. S. 77

Certiorari, 292 U.S. 619, to review the affirmance of an order denying a motion to quash a summons and the service thereof in an action for libel.

Page 293 U. S. 80

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.