ROBERTS v. WASHINGTON TRUST CO, 292 U.S. 608 (1934)

U.S. Supreme Court

ROBERTS v. WASHINGTON TRUST CO, 292 U.S. 608 (1934)

292 U.S. 608

Georgia ROBERTS, by her next friend, Margaret H. Roberts, et al., appellants,
v.
WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY.*
No. 975.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 1934

Mr. Robert H. Locke, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

For opinion below, see 313 Pa. 584, 170 A. 291.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237(a) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937, 28 USCA 344(a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by section 237(c) Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938, 28 USCA 344(c), certiorari is denied.

* Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 613, 54 S. Ct. 857, 78 L. Ed. --.[ Roberts v. Washington Trust Co 292 U.S. 608 (1934) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

ROBERTS v. WASHINGTON TRUST CO, 292 U.S. 608 (1934)

292 U.S. 608

Georgia ROBERTS, by her next friend, Margaret H. Roberts, et al., appellants,
v.
WASHINGTON TRUST COMPANY.*
No. 975.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 14, 1934

Mr. Robert H. Locke, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

For opinion below, see 313 Pa. 584, 170 A. 291.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237(a) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937, 28 USCA 344(a). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by section 237(c) Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938, 28 USCA 344(c), certiorari is denied.

* Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 613, 54 S. Ct. 857, 78 L. Ed. --.[ Roberts v. Washington Trust Co 292 U.S. 608 (1934) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.