PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL SACKETT v. LYNCH, 291 U.S. 652 (1934)

U.S. Supreme Court

PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL SACKETT v. LYNCH, 291 U.S. 652 (1934)

291 U.S. 652

The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, on the relation of Harry P. SACKETT, appellant,
v.
Thomas M. LYNCH et al., constituting the State Tax Commission of the State of New York.*
No. 814.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 1934

Messrs. Jerome A. Weiss, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Wm. F. Unger, of New York City, for appellants.

Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Atty. Gen., Henry Epstein, of New York City, and Joseph M. Mesnig, of Albany, N. Y., for appellees.

For opinion below, see 263 N. Y. 568, 189 N. E. 701.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question, kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 182, 186, 187 S., 18 S. Ct. 550; Layton v. Missouri, 187 U.S. 356, 358, 23 S. Ct. 137; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U.S. 133, 135, 23 S. Ct. 48; Saltonstall v. Saltonstall, 276 U.S. 260, 267, 268 S., 48 S. Ct. 225.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 713, 78 L. Ed. --.[ People of State of New York ex rel Sackett v. Lynch 291 U.S. 652 (1934) ]




U.S. Supreme Court

PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL SACKETT v. LYNCH, 291 U.S. 652 (1934)

291 U.S. 652

The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, on the relation of Harry P. SACKETT, appellant,
v.
Thomas M. LYNCH et al., constituting the State Tax Commission of the State of New York.*
No. 814.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 19, 1934

Messrs. Jerome A. Weiss, of Brooklyn, N. Y., and Wm. F. Unger, of New York City, for appellants.

Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Atty. Gen., Henry Epstein, of New York City, and Joseph M. Mesnig, of Albany, N. Y., for appellees.

For opinion below, see 263 N. Y. 568, 189 N. E. 701.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question, kipley v. Illinois, 170 U.S. 182, 186, 187 S., 18 S. Ct. 550; Layton v. Missouri, 187 U.S. 356, 358, 23 S. Ct. 137; Jacobi v. Alabama, 187 U.S. 133, 135, 23 S. Ct. 48; Saltonstall v. Saltonstall, 276 U.S. 260, 267, 268 S., 48 S. Ct. 225.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Rehearing denied 292 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 713, 78 L. Ed. --.[ People of State of New York ex rel Sackett v. Lynch 291 U.S. 652 (1934) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.