ROSS v. FORT, 290 U.S. 603 (1933)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

ROSS v. FORT, 290 U.S. 603 (1933)

290 U.S. 603

Lida M. ROSS, appellant,
v.
Dancey FORT, Commissioner of Finance and Taxation of the State of Tennessee.
No. 613.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 18, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.

Mr. J. A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

For opinion below, see 61 S.W.(2d) 479.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial Federal question. (1) Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U.S. 12, 40 S. Ct. 417; (2) Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19, 22-24, 51 S. Ct. 15, 73 A. L. R. 679; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 298, 299 S., 18 S. Ct. 594; Keeney v. New York, 222 U.S. 525, 535, 536 S., 32 S. Ct. 105; Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540, 550, 32 S. Ct. 784.[ Ross v. Fort 290 U.S. 603 (1933) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

ROSS v. FORT, 290 U.S. 603 (1933)

 290 U.S. 603

Lida M. ROSS, appellant,
v.
Dancey FORT, Commissioner of Finance and Taxation of the State of Tennessee.
No. 613.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 18, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.

Mr. J. A. Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

For opinion below, see 61 S.W.(2d) 479.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial Federal question. (1) Maguire v. Trefry, 253 U.S. 12, 40 S. Ct. 417; (2) Klein v. Board of Supervisors, 282 U.S. 19, 22-24, 51 S. Ct. 15, 73 A. L. R. 679; Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank, 170 U.S. 283, 298, 299 S., 18 S. Ct. 594; Keeney v. New York, 222 U.S. 525, 535, 536 S., 32 S. Ct. 105; Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540, 550, 32 S. Ct. 784.[ Ross v. Fort 290 U.S. 603 (1933) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.