C. M. PATTEN & COMPANY v. U.S., 289 U.S. 705 (1933)
U.S. Supreme Court
C. M. PATTEN & COMPANY v. U.S., 289 U.S. 705 (1933)
289 U.S. 705
C. M. PATTEN & COMPANY and Grace M. Wilder, petitioners,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America.
No. 691.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 8, 1933
Mr. Frank P. Doherty, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Mr. William R. Gallagher, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for petitioners.
Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and John R. Laying, U. S. Atty., and Sharpless Walker, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
For opinion below, see 61 F.(2d) 970.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216, 43 S. Ct. 263; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536 S., 46 S. Ct. 600; U. S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States Tariff Commission, 274 U.S. 106, 112, 47 S. Ct. 499; Railroad Commission of Texas v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576, 53 S. Ct. 223, 77 L. Ed. --.[ C. M. Patten & Company v. U.S. 289 U.S. 705 (1933) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
C. M. PATTEN & COMPANY v. U.S., 289 U.S. 705 (1933)
C. M. PATTEN & COMPANY and Grace M. Wilder, petitioners,
v.
The UNITED STATES of America.
No. 691.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 8, 1933
Mr. Frank P. Doherty, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Mr. William R. Gallagher, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for petitioners.
Mr. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and John R. Laying, U. S. Atty., and Sharpless Walker, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
For opinion below, see 61 F.(2d) 970.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is granted. The decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the proceeding upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216, 43 S. Ct. 263; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536 S., 46 S. Ct. 600; U. S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States Tariff Commission, 274 U.S. 106, 112, 47 S. Ct. 499; Railroad Commission of Texas v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576, 53 S. Ct. 223, 77 L. Ed. --.[ C. M. Patten & Company v. U.S. 289 U.S. 705 (1933) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.
