LEWIS v. REYNOLDS, 284 U.S. 599 (1932)

U.S. Supreme Court

LEWIS v. REYNOLDS, 284 U.S. 599 (1932)

284 U.S. 599

Edgar Percy LEWIS et al., petitioners,
v.
Marshall S. REYNOLDS, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue.
No. 115.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 15, 1932

In this cause it is ordered that the following words be deleted from the sixth paragraph, of the opinion announced on January 4, 1932:

    'Also that at the time of his last decision he was restricted to consideration of the demand for refund and determination of whether the trustees were entitled to deduct the State inheritance taxes.'

Otherwise the opinion will stand as heretofore announced.[ Lewis v. Reynolds 284 U.S. 599 (1932) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

LEWIS v. REYNOLDS, 284 U.S. 599 (1932)

284 U.S. 599

Edgar Percy LEWIS et al., petitioners,
v.
Marshall S. REYNOLDS, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue.
No. 115.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 15, 1932

In this cause it is ordered that the following words be deleted from the sixth paragraph, of the opinion announced on January 4, 1932:

    'Also that at the time of his last decision he was restricted to consideration of the demand for refund and determination of whether the trustees were entitled to deduct the State inheritance taxes.'

Otherwise the opinion will stand as heretofore announced.[ Lewis v. Reynolds 284 U.S. 599 (1932) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.