BORUM v. U S, 284 U.S. 596 (1932)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

BORUM v. U S, 284 U.S. 596 (1932)

284 U.S. 596

BORUM et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 550.

Decided Jan. 25, 1932.

Mr. James A. O'Shea, of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. John H. Burnett, Alfred Goldstine, and Bertrand Emerson, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Borum and others.

The Attorney General, Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., and Erwin N. Griswold, both of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and William H. Collins, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Question answered 'Yes.' Dunn v. United States (No. 393) 284 U.S. 390, 52 S. Ct. 189, October term, 1931, decided January 11, 1932. Mandate to issue forthwith.


U.S. Supreme Court

BORUM v. U S, 284 U.S. 596 (1932)

284 U.S. 596

BORUM et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 550.

Decided Jan. 25, 1932.

Mr. James A. O'Shea, of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. John H. Burnett, Alfred Goldstine, and Bertrand Emerson, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Borum and others.

The Attorney General, Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., and Erwin N. Griswold, both of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and William H. Collins, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

Question answered 'Yes.' Dunn v. United States (No. 393) 284 U.S. 390, 52 S. Ct. 189, October term, 1931, decided January 11, 1932. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.