KEATING v. PUBLIC NAT BANK OF NEW YORK
284 U.S. 587 (1931)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

KEATING v. PUBLIC NAT BANK OF NEW YORK, 284 U.S. 587 (1931)

284 U.S. 587

Andrew B. KEATING, as Receiver of Taxes of the City of New York, and William Reid, Jr., as City Collector, appellants,
v.
The PUBLIC NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK.
No. 71.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 7, 1931

Messrs. Arthur J. W. Hilly and William Herbert King, both of New York City, for appellants.

Messrs. Martin Saxe and Henry L. Moses, both of New York City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed Bodkin v. Edward, 255 U.S. 221, 223, 41 S. Ct. 268; Texas & New Orleans R. R. Co. v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, 281 U.S. 548, 558, 50 S. Ct. 427; First National Bank of Hartford, Wisconsin, v. City of Hartford, 273 U.S. 548, 47 S. Ct. 462, 59 A. L. R. 1; Minnesota v. First National Bank of St. Paul, 273 U.S. 561, 47 S. Ct. 468; Georgetown National Bank v. McFarland, 273 U.S. 658, 47 S. Ct. 467.[ Keating v. Public Nat Bank of New York 284 U.S. 587 (1931) ]


Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.