American Bond & Mortgage Co. v. United States, 282 U.S. 374 (1931)
U.S. Supreme Court
American Bond & Mortgage Co. v. United States, 282 U.S. 374 (1931)American Bond and Mortgage Company v. United States
No. 210
Argued December 5, 1930
Decided January 5, 1931
282 U.S. 374
Syllabus
Certificate presenting substantially the same questions as in White v. Johnson, ante, p. 282 U. S. 367, dismissed on the authority of that case.
Certificate from the circuit court of appeals, on a appeal from a decree of the district court enjoining the operation of a broadcasting station in violation of the provisions of the Radio Act.
U.S. Supreme Court
American Bond & Mortgage Co. v. United States, 282 U.S. 374 (1931)American Bond and Mortgage Company v. United States
No. 210
Argued December 5, 1930
Decided January 5, 1931
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
Certificate presenting substantially the same questions as in White v. Johnson, ante, p. 282 U. S. 367, dismissed on the authority of that case.
Certificate from the circuit court of appeals, on a appeal from a decree of the district court enjoining the operation of a broadcasting station in violation of the provisions of the Radio Act.
MR. JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.
The same circuit court of appeals which certified questions in White v. Johnson, ante, p. 282 U. S. 367, also certified six questions in this case. While they are differently phrased, they are in substance the same.
Here, a suit in equity was brought by the United States to restrain the proprietor of a broadcasting station from disregarding an order of the Federal Radio Commission, revoking its license, and from operating in defiance of the provisions of the Radio Act (47 U.S.C.A § 81 et seq.). As in the other case, the appellants admittedly failed to avail themselves of the right of appeal afforded by the Act.
The reasons stated in No. 29 for not answering the questions therein certified apply here.
The certificate is dismissed.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.