HANSEN v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., 281 U.S. 751 (1930)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

HANSEN v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., 281 U.S. 751 (1930)

281 U.S. 751

Emil HANSEN, Permanent Receiver of Syracuse Sand Company, Inc., petitioner,
v.
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Inc. [Footnote 1]
No. 758.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 5, 1930

Mr. Emil Hansen, pro se.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Footnotes

Footnote 1 The order sought to be reviewed here was a denial of motion to retax costs and no opinion thereon was filed in the court below. See, also, 33 F.(2d) 74 and 280 U.S. 589, 50 S. Ct. 37, 74 L. Ed. -.[ Hansen v. E I du Pont De Nemours & Co. 281 U.S. 751 (1930) ]




U.S. Supreme Court

HANSEN v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO., 281 U.S. 751 (1930)

281 U.S. 751

Emil HANSEN, Permanent Receiver of Syracuse Sand Company, Inc., petitioner,
v.
E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, Inc. [Footnote 1]
No. 758.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 5, 1930

Mr. Emil Hansen, pro se.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Footnotes

Footnote 1 The order sought to be reviewed here was a denial of motion to retax costs and no opinion thereon was filed in the court below. See, also, 33 F.(2d) 74 and 280 U.S. 589, 50 S. Ct. 37, 74 L. Ed. -.[ Hansen v. E I du Pont De Nemours & Co. 281 U.S. 751 (1930) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.