LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
281 U.S. 702 Florence B. LAWS, appellant, Supreme Court of the United States May 19, 1930U.S. Supreme Court
LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
No. 744.
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et al.
Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company, 163 U.S. 63, 16 S. Ct. 939.
U.S. Supreme Court
LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
281 U.S. 702
No. 744.
Florence B. LAWS, appellant,
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et al.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 19, 1930
Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company, 163 U.S. 63, 16 S. Ct. 939.
