LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
U.S. Supreme Court
LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
281 U.S. 702
No. 744.
Florence B. LAWS, appellant,
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et al.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 19, 1930
Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company, 163 U.S. 63, 16 S. Ct. 939.
U.S. Supreme Court
LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
281 U.S. 702
No. 744.
Florence B. LAWS, appellant,
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et al.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 19, 1930
Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company, 163 U.S. 63, 16 S. Ct. 939.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.