LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)
Syllabus
U.S. Supreme Court
LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930)281 U.S. 702
No. 744.
Florence B. LAWS, appellant,
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et
al.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 19, 1930
Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the
State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal
ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S.
255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company,
163 U.S. 63, 16 S.
Ct. 939.
Opinions
No. 744.
Florence B. LAWS, appellant,
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et al. Supreme Court of the United States May 19, 1930 Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company, 163 U.S. 63, 16 S. Ct. 939.
U.S. Supreme Court
LAWS v. DAVIS, 281 U.S. 702 (1930) 281 U.S. 702No. 744.
Florence B. LAWS, appellant,
v.
Eleanor Bradford DAVIS, Blanche L. Bradford, Hannah B. Neff, et al. Supreme Court of the United States May 19, 1930 Mr. Walter A. DeCamp, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the State court sought here to be reviewed is based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Dibble v. Bellingham Bay Land Company, 163 U.S. 63, 16 S. Ct. 939.
Search This Case
