U S EX REL WENGER v. MATHUES, 279 U.S. 817 (1929)

U.S. Supreme Court

U S EX REL WENGER v. MATHUES, 279 U.S. 817 (1929)

279 U.S. 817
No. 631.

The UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Joseph Wenger, appellant,
v.
W. Frank MATHUES, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 11, 1929

Mr. Joseph Blank, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., and W. Marvin Smith, both of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of section 240(b) and (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925, 1 (43 Stat. 938; 28 USCA 347(b) and (c), for lack of jurisdiction.[ U S ex rel Wenger v. Mathues 279 U.S. 817 (1929) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

U S EX REL WENGER v. MATHUES, 279 U.S. 817 (1929)

279 U.S. 817
No. 631.

The UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Joseph Wenger, appellant,
v.
W. Frank MATHUES, United States Marshal for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 11, 1929

Mr. Joseph Blank, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., and W. Marvin Smith, both of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of section 240(b) and (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925, 1 (43 Stat. 938; 28 USCA 347(b) and (c), for lack of jurisdiction.[ U S ex rel Wenger v. Mathues 279 U.S. 817 (1929) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.