STANDARD PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE, 278 U.S. 558 (1928)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

STANDARD PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE, 278 U.S. 558 (1928)

278 U.S. 558
No. 11.

STANDARD PIPE LINE COMPANY, Inc., et al., petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE DISTRICT.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 15, 1928

Messrs. T. M. Milling, of Shreveport, La., and William H. Arnold, William H. Arnold, Jr., and David C. Arnold, all of Texarkana, Ark., for petitioner.

Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari (48 S. Ct. 420) is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, 271, 39 S. Ct. 111.[ Standard Pipe Line Co v. Comm. of Index Sulphur Drainage Dist. 278 U.S. 558 (1928) ]



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

STANDARD PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE, 278 U.S. 558 (1928)  278 U.S. 558 
No. 11.

STANDARD PIPE LINE COMPANY, Inc., et al., petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE DISTRICT.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 15, 1928

Messrs. T. M. Milling, of Shreveport, La., and William H. Arnold, William H. Arnold, Jr., and David C. Arnold, all of Texarkana, Ark., for petitioner.

Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., of Texarkana, Ark., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari (48 S. Ct. 420) is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on a non-Federal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Ct. 264; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, 271, 39 S. Ct. 111.[ Standard Pipe Line Co v. Comm. of Index Sulphur Drainage Dist. 278 U.S. 558 (1928) ]