CHESAPEAKE & O R. CO. v. LEITCH, 275 U.S. 507 (1927)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CHESAPEAKE & O R. CO. v. LEITCH, 275 U.S. 507 (1927)

275 U.S. 507
No. 98.

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
K. S. LEITCH. * 

Supreme Court of the United States

December 12, 1927

Mr. Douglas W. Brown, of Huntington, W. Va., for petitioner.

Mr. Jonn H. Holt, of Huntington, W. Va., for respondent.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of West Virginia in this case is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Rehearing granted 48 S. Ct. 213, 72 L. Ed. -, and judgment reversed 276 U.S. 429, 48 S. Ct. 336, 72 L. Ed. -.[ Chesapeake & O R Co v. Leitch 275 U.S. 507 (1927) ]

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CHESAPEAKE & O R. CO. v. LEITCH, 275 U.S. 507 (1927)

 275 U.S. 507 
No. 98.

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
K. S. LEITCH. * 

Supreme Court of the United States

December 12, 1927

Mr. Douglas W. Brown, of Huntington, W. Va., for petitioner.

Mr. Jonn H. Holt, of Huntington, W. Va., for respondent.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of West Virginia in this case is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Rehearing granted 48 S. Ct. 213, 72 L. Ed. -, and judgment reversed 276 U.S. 429, 48 S. Ct. 336, 72 L. Ed. -.[ Chesapeake & O R Co v. Leitch 275 U.S. 507 (1927) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.