CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. COUGHLIN, 274 U.S. 751 (1927)
U.S. Supreme Court
CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. COUGHLIN, 274 U.S. 751 (1927)
274 U.S. 751
CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
John J. COUGHLIN and J. C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc.
No. 1047.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 31, 1927
Messrs. Robert S. Erskine and John M. Woolsey, both of New York City, for petitioner.
Messrs. Horace L. Cheyney and P. M. Brown, both of New York City, for respondents Goldrick and others.
Messrs. Leo J. Curren and George V. A. McCloskey, both of New York City, for respondent Coughlin.
Mr. Mark Ash, of New York City, for respondent Empire Brick & Supply Co.
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. [Footnote 1]
Footnotes
Footnote 1 No opinion filed in the Circuit Court of Appeals.[ Cornell Steamboat Co v. Coughlin 274 U.S. 751 (1927) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. COUGHLIN, 274 U.S. 751 (1927)
CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
John J. COUGHLIN and J. C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc.
No. 1047.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 31, 1927
Messrs. Robert S. Erskine and John M. Woolsey, both of New York City, for petitioner.
Messrs. Horace L. Cheyney and P. M. Brown, both of New York City, for respondents Goldrick and others.
Messrs. Leo J. Curren and George V. A. McCloskey, both of New York City, for respondent Coughlin.
Mr. Mark Ash, of New York City, for respondent Empire Brick & Supply Co.
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. [Footnote 1]
Footnotes
Footnote 1 No opinion filed in the Circuit Court of Appeals.[ Cornell Steamboat Co v. Coughlin 274 U.S. 751 (1927) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.