CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. COUGHLIN, 274 U.S. 751 (1927)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. COUGHLIN, 274 U.S. 751 (1927)

274 U.S. 751

CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
John J. COUGHLIN and J. C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc.
No. 1047.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1927

Messrs. Robert S. Erskine and John M. Woolsey, both of New York City, for petitioner.

Messrs. Horace L. Cheyney and P. M. Brown, both of New York City, for respondents Goldrick and others.

Messrs. Leo J. Curren and George V. A. McCloskey, both of New York City, for respondent Coughlin.

Mr. Mark Ash, of New York City, for respondent Empire Brick & Supply Co.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. [Footnote 1]

Footnotes

Footnote 1 No opinion filed in the Circuit Court of Appeals.[ Cornell Steamboat Co v. Coughlin 274 U.S. 751 (1927) ]

 


U.S. Supreme Court

CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. COUGHLIN, 274 U.S. 751 (1927)

 274 U.S. 751

CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, petitioner,
v.
John J. COUGHLIN and J. C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc.
No. 1047.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 31, 1927

Messrs. Robert S. Erskine and John M. Woolsey, both of New York City, for petitioner.

Messrs. Horace L. Cheyney and P. M. Brown, both of New York City, for respondents Goldrick and others.

Messrs. Leo J. Curren and George V. A. McCloskey, both of New York City, for respondent Coughlin.

Mr. Mark Ash, of New York City, for respondent Empire Brick & Supply Co.

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. [Footnote 1]

Footnotes

Footnote 1 No opinion filed in the Circuit Court of Appeals.[ Cornell Steamboat Co v. Coughlin 274 U.S. 751 (1927) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.