MELLON v. NEW JERSEY SHIPBUILDING & DREDGING CO, 274 U.S. 738 (1927)
U.S. Supreme Court
MELLON v. NEW JERSEY SHIPBUILDING & DREDGING CO, 274 U.S. 738 (1927)
274 U.S. 738
No. 953.
Andrew W. MELLON, Agent, under section 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 (New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad), petitioner,
v.
NEW JERSEY SHIPBUILDING & DREDGING COMPANY. [Footnote 1]
Supreme Court of the United States
April 18, 1927
Mr. Charles M. Sheafe, Jr., of New York City (Messrs. Evan Shelby and John E. Walker, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.
Mr. Mark Ash, of New York City, for respondent.
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 No opinion filed in Circuit Court of Appeals. For opinion in District Court, see New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co. v. Davis, 11 F.( 2d) 994.[ Mellon v. New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co 274 U.S. 738 (1927) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
MELLON v. NEW JERSEY SHIPBUILDING & DREDGING CO, 274 U.S. 738 (1927)
274 U.S. 738
No. 953.
Andrew W. MELLON, Agent, under section 206 of the Transportation Act of 1920 (New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad), petitioner,
v.
NEW JERSEY SHIPBUILDING & DREDGING COMPANY. [Footnote 1]
Supreme Court of the United States
April 18, 1927
Mr. Charles M. Sheafe, Jr., of New York City (Messrs. Evan Shelby and John E. Walker, both of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.
Mr. Mark Ash, of New York City, for respondent.
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 No opinion filed in Circuit Court of Appeals. For opinion in District Court, see New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co. v. Davis, 11 F.( 2d) 994.[ Mellon v. New Jersey Shipbuilding & Dredging Co 274 U.S. 738 (1927) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.