MELLON v. GRAY, 274 U.S. 715 (1927)
U.S. Supreme Court
MELLON v. GRAY, 274 U.S. 715 (1927)
274 U.S. 715
No. 280.
Andrew W. MELLON, as Director General of Railroads, petitioner,
v.
Leah M. GRAY, Administratrix of the ESTATE OF Glen E. GRAY.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 25, 1927
Messrs. Shurtleff, Oakes & Hinkley, of Lancaster, N. H., and Charles H. Blatchford, of Portland, Me., for petitioner.
Messrs. Hollis R. Bailey, of Boston, Mass., and Murchie & Murchie, of Concord, N. H. (Messrs. Alexander Murchie and Robert C. Murchie, both of Concord, N. H., of counsel), for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed on the authority of Reading Company v. John L. Koons, Administrator, 271 U.S. 58, 46 S. Ct. 405.[ Mellon v. Gray 274 U.S. 715 (1927) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
MELLON v. GRAY, 274 U.S. 715 (1927)
274 U.S. 715
No. 280.
Andrew W. MELLON, as Director General of Railroads, petitioner,
v.
Leah M. GRAY, Administratrix of the ESTATE OF Glen E. GRAY.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 25, 1927
Messrs. Shurtleff, Oakes & Hinkley, of Lancaster, N. H., and Charles H. Blatchford, of Portland, Me., for petitioner.
Messrs. Hollis R. Bailey, of Boston, Mass., and Murchie & Murchie, of Concord, N. H. (Messrs. Alexander Murchie and Robert C. Murchie, both of Concord, N. H., of counsel), for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed on the authority of Reading Company v. John L. Koons, Administrator, 271 U.S. 58, 46 S. Ct. 405.[ Mellon v. Gray 274 U.S. 715 (1927) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.