SMITH v. U S SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION, 273 U.S. 747 (1927)
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. U S SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION, 273 U.S. 747 (1927)
273 U.S. 747
Jacob Telfair SMITH, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION;
and
CATZ AMERICAN SHIPPING COMPANY, Inc., petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY ELEET CORPORATION. *
Nos. 796, 797.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 21, 1927
Mr. John C. Prizer, of New York City, for petitioners.
Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., George R. Farnum, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Frank Staley, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
* This application for certiorari was on permission of the Court of Appeals in which the case was still pending and undetermined.[ Smith v. U S Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation 273 U.S. 747 (1927) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
SMITH v. U S SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION, 273 U.S. 747 (1927)
Jacob Telfair SMITH, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION;
and
CATZ AMERICAN SHIPPING COMPANY, Inc., petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY ELEET CORPORATION. *
Nos. 796, 797.
Supreme Court of the United States
February 21, 1927
Mr. John C. Prizer, of New York City, for petitioners.
Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., George R. Farnum, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Frank Staley, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
* This application for certiorari was on permission of the Court of Appeals in which the case was still pending and undetermined.[ Smith v. U S Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation 273 U.S. 747 (1927) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.