SMITH v. U S SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION, 273 U.S. 747 (1927)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. U S SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION, 273 U.S. 747 (1927)

273 U.S. 747

Jacob Telfair SMITH, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION;

and

CATZ AMERICAN SHIPPING COMPANY, Inc., petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY ELEET CORPORATION. * 

Nos. 796, 797.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 21, 1927

Mr. John C. Prizer, of New York City, for petitioners.

Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., George R. Farnum, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Frank Staley, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

* This application for certiorari was on permission of the Court of Appeals in which the case was still pending and undetermined.[ Smith v. U S Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation 273 U.S. 747 (1927) ]


U.S. Supreme Court

SMITH v. U S SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION, 273 U.S. 747 (1927)

 273 U.S. 747

Jacob Telfair SMITH, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION;

and

CATZ AMERICAN SHIPPING COMPANY, Inc., petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY ELEET CORPORATION. * 

Nos. 796, 797.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 21, 1927

Mr. John C. Prizer, of New York City, for petitioners.

Messrs. William D. Mitchell, Sol. Gen., George R. Farnum, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. Frank Staley, of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

* This application for certiorari was on permission of the Court of Appeals in which the case was still pending and undetermined.[ Smith v. U S Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation 273 U.S. 747 (1927) ]

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.