FRANCIS v. WILLIAMS, 273 U.S. 693 (1926)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

FRANCIS v. WILLIAMS, 273 U.S. 693 (1926)

273 U.S. 693
No. 371.

Rothschild FRANCIS, petitioner,
v.
George Washington WILLIAMS, Judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands of the United States.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1926

Messrs. Adolf A. Berle, Jr., of New York City, and David Wallerstein, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Mr. Charles H. Gibson, of Thomas, Virgin Islands, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.


U.S. Supreme Court

FRANCIS v. WILLIAMS, 273 U.S. 693 (1926)

 273 U.S. 693 
No. 371.

Rothschild FRANCIS, petitioner,
v.
George Washington WILLIAMS, Judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands of the United States.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 11, 1926

Messrs. Adolf A. Berle, Jr., of New York City, and David Wallerstein, of Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

Mr. Charles H. Gibson, of Thomas, Virgin Islands, for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.