TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA R CO
273 U.S. 665 (1927)

 Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA R CO, 273 U.S. 665 (1927)

273 U.S. 665

TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING COMPANY, plaintiff in error,
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,*

and

Thomas P. GOODBODY, as Receiver of the Hydraulic Steel Company, plaintiff in error,
v.
The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY.

Nos. 168, 178.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 28, 1927

Messrs. Luther Day and Rufus S. Day, both of Cleveland, Ohio (Donald W. Kling, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Andrew Squire, Thomas M. Kirby and Andrew P. Martin, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in this Court on the authority of Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. Almeida, 265 U.S. 104, 105, 44 S. Ct. 449, and Oliver American Trading Co. v. United States of Mexico, 264 U.S. 440, 442, 44 S. Ct. 390.

Footnotes

[Footnote *] Dismissal set aside 274 U.S. 181, 47 S. Ct. 550, 71 L. Ed. -.[ Timken Roller Bearing Co v. Pennsylvania R Co 273 U.S. 665 (1927) ]




Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.