Hassler, Inc. v. Shaw,
271 U.S. 195 (1926)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Hassler, Inc. v. Shaw, 271 U.S. 195 (1926)

Hassler, Inc. v. Shaw

No. 278

Argued April 27, 1926

Decided May 10, 1926

271 U.S. 195


1. A petition to remove from state to federal court is not a general appearance. P. 271 U. S. 199.

2. Pleading to the merits, after overruling of motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over defendant which defendant does not waive, is not submission to the jurisdiction. P. 271 U. S. 200.

Page 271 U. S. 196

3. Where objection to the jurisdiction appears in the record proper, it is not necessary to reiterate it in a bill of exceptions. P. 271 U. S. 200.

3 F.2d 605 reversed.

Error to a judgment of the district court on a verdict recovered in an action on contract brought in a South Carolina court by a resident of that state against an Indiana corporation and removed to the federal court.

Page 271 U. S. 198

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.