Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Hanna, 266 U.S. 184 (1924)

U.S. Supreme Court

Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Hanna, 266 U.S. 184 (1924)

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Hanna

No. 54

Submitted October 8, 1924

Decided November 17, 1924

266 U.S. 184

Syllabus

A writ of certiorari to a state court will be dismissed when the record fails to show that the federal question indicated in the petition for the writ was raised below.

Writ of certiorari to renew 157 Ark. 32 dismissed.

Certiorari to a judgment of the Supreme Court of Arkansas which sustained a judgment recovered by the respondent for personal injuries suffered by him in Illinois while a passenger on the petitioner's railroad.

U.S. Supreme Court

Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Hanna, 266 U.S. 184 (1924)

Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Hanna

No. 54

Submitted October 8, 1924

Decided November 17, 1924

266 U.S. 184

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS

Syllabus

A writ of certiorari to a state court will be dismissed when the record fails to show that the federal question indicated in the petition for the writ was raised below.

Writ of certiorari to renew 157 Ark. 32 dismissed.

Certiorari to a judgment of the Supreme Court of Arkansas which sustained a judgment recovered by the respondent for personal injuries suffered by him in Illinois while a passenger on the petitioner's railroad.

MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

When this writ was granted, we of course supposed petitioner had properly raised and relied upon the indicated federal question in the courts below by claiming that its responsibility for injuries sustained by respondent while traveling on an interstate drover's pass depended upon acts of Congress and applicable principles of common law as interpreted and applied by the federal courts. Southern Express Co. v. Byers, 240 U. S. 612, 240 U. S. 614.

The record fails to disclose that it definitely raised the point in either trial or supreme court. On the contrary, it was there insisted that liability should be determined under the laws of Illinois, the state wherein the accident occurred.

The writ is accordingly

Dismissed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.