GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
U.S. Supreme Court
GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)260 U.S. 693
Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs
in error,
v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1922
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526, 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97.
FootnotesFootnote 1 24 Sup. Ct. 174.
Footnote 2 32 Sup. Ct. 704.[ Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693 (1922) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922) 260 U.S. 693 Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs in error,v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.
Supreme Court of the United States October 9, 1922 Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526, 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97. Footnotes Footnote 1 24 Sup. Ct. 174. Footnote 2 32 Sup. Ct. 704.[ Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693 (1922) ]
