GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
260 U.S. 693 Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs in error, Supreme Court of the United States October 9, 1922U.S. Supreme Court
GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526, 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 24 Sup. Ct. 174.
Footnote 2 32 Sup. Ct. 704.[ Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693 (1922) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs in error,
v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1922
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526, 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 24 Sup. Ct. 174.
Footnote 2 32 Sup. Ct. 704.[ Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693 (1922) ]
