GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
U.S. Supreme Court
GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
260 U.S. 693
Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs in error,
v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1922
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526, 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 24 Sup. Ct. 174.
Footnote 2 32 Sup. Ct. 704.[ Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693 (1922) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
GETTYS v. NEWBURGER, 260 U.S. 693 (1922)
Seth GETTYS et al., etc., plaintiffs in error,
v.
Silvan NEWBURGER, Joseph Newburger, et al.
No. 183.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 9, 1922
Messrs. W. A. Ledbetter, H. L. Stuart and R. R. Bell, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Henry E. Asp, Henry G. Snyder, Frederick B. Owen, and Walter A. Lybrand, all of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Bernard Titche, of New Orleans, La., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Spencer v. Duplan Silk Co., 191 U.S. 526, 530;1 Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U.S. 561, 569;2 Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 24 Sup. Ct. 174.
Footnote 2 32 Sup. Ct. 704.[ Gettys v. Newburger 260 U.S. 693 (1922) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.