United States v. Northeastern Construction Co., 260 U.S. 326 (1922)

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Northeastern Construction Co., 260 U.S. 326 (1922)

United States v. Northeastern Construction Company

No. 122

Argued November 24, 1922

Decided December 4, 1922

260 U.S. 326

Syllabus

Decided on the authority of United States v. Mason & Hanger Co., ante, 260 U. S. 323.

56 Ct.Clms. 492 affirmed.

Appeal by the United States from a judgment of the Court of Claims. See the per curiam decision of April 9, 1923, to be reported in volume 261, reaffirming the judgment after rehearing.

Page 260 U. S. 327

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Northeastern Construction Co., 260 U.S. 326 (1922)

United States v. Northeastern Construction Company

No. 122

Argued November 24, 1922

Decided December 4, 1922

260 U.S. 326

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIM

Syllabus

Decided on the authority of United States v. Mason & Hanger Co., ante, 260 U. S. 323.

56 Ct.Clms. 492 affirmed.

Appeal by the United States from a judgment of the Court of Claims. See the per curiam decision of April 9, 1923, to be reported in volume 261, reaffirming the judgment after rehearing.

Page 260 U. S. 327

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the Court.

Judgment in this case was rendered at the same time as that in Mason & Hanger Co. v. United States, ante, 260 U. S. 323.

The amounts only are different. In that case, it was $2,500 -- in this case it is $150. In both, the amounts represented premiums on bonds and depend upon the same considerations. On the authority of the Mason & Hanger Co. case, the judgment of the Court of Claims in this case is

Affirmed.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.