United States v. M. Rice & Co.,
257 U.S. 536 (1922)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. M. Rice & Co., 257 U.S. 536 (1922)

United States v. M. Rice & Company

No. 114

Argued January 26, 1922

Decided February 27, 1922

257 U.S. 536


In an importer's protest, under par. N of the Tariff Act of 1913, against a collector's decision on classification of goods, it is not necessary to set up the similitude clause (par. 386), which merely prescribes a rule of construction applicable to every paragraph of the tariff imposing duty on specifically described articles. P. 257 U. S. 538.

10 Cust.App. 165 affirmed.

Certiorari to review a Judgment of the Court of Customs Appeals which, reversing a judgment order of the Board of General Appraisers (unpublished abstract No. 43,391; 37 T.D. 356; Brown, G. A. dissenting), sustained the respondents' claim.

Page 257 U. S. 537

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.