American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead, 256 U.S. 40 (1921)
U.S. Supreme Court
American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead, 256 U.S. 40 (1921)American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead
No. 131
Argued January 12, 13, 1921
Decided April 11, 1921
256 U.S. 40
Syllabus
Decided on the authority of Baldwin Co. v. Howard Co., ante, 256 U. S. 35.
Writ of certiorari to review 49 App.D.C. 16, 258 F. 160, dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
U.S. Supreme Court
American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead, 256 U.S. 40 (1921)American Steel Foundries v. Whitehead
No. 131
Argued January 12, 13, 1921
Decided April 11, 1921
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Syllabus
Decided on the authority of Baldwin Co. v. Howard Co., ante, 256 U. S. 35.
Writ of certiorari to review 49 App.D.C. 16, 258 F. 160, dismissed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case, a writ of certiorari was granted by this Court on October 13, 1919, 250 U.S. 655. The case involves an application for the registration of a trademark, which was refused by the Examiner in the Patent Office, which decision was affirmed by the Commissioner of Patents, and his decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. 49 App.D.C. 16, 258 F. 160. This case is ruled by Nos. 139 and 113, just decided, ante, 256 U. S. 35. As the writ of certiorari in this case, for the reasons stated in the opinion in No. 139, was improvidently granted, it follows that the cause must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and it is
So ordered.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.