Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Puget Sound & W. H. Ry. Co.,
250 U.S. 332 (1919)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Puget Sound & W. H. Ry. Co., 250 U.S. 332 (1919)

Northern Pacific Railway Company v.

Puget Sound & Willapa Harbor Railway Company

No. 327

Argued April 28, 1919

Decided June 2, 1919

250 U.S. 332


A railroad company, by constructing its road, gains no vested right to the retention of a general rule of law, then in existence, laying the expense of installing and maintaining required safety devices, where one railroad exercises its right to cross another, upon the company making the crossing, and it is not deprived of its property without due process by a change of the rule under which it is required to share such expense equally with a junior company. P. 250 U. S. 335.

94 Wash. 10; 97 id. 701, affirmed.

Page 250 U. S. 333

The case is stated in the opinion.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.