SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT, 248 U.S. 543 (1918)

Justia Opinion Summary and Annotations
Read more

U.S. Supreme Court

SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT , 248 U.S. 543 (1918)

248 U.S. 543

Frederick R. SEARS et al., plaintiffs in error,
v.
INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF NAHANT, etc.
No. 61.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 23, 1918

Mr. Burton E. Eames, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Arthur D. Hill, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S. 168, 181, 19 S. Sup. Ct. 644; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S. 239, 243, 20 S. Sup. Ct. 867; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100, 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232, 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79, 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U.S. 596, 599, 33 S. Sup. Ct. 605; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 304, 37 S. Sup. Ct. 643; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Sup. Ct. 264.


U.S. Supreme Court

SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT , 248 U.S. 543 (1918)

248 U.S. 543

Frederick R. SEARS et al., plaintiffs in error,
v.
INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF NAHANT, etc.
No. 61.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 23, 1918

Mr. Burton E. Eames, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Arthur D. Hill, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S. 168, 181, 19 S. Sup. Ct. 644; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S. 239, 243, 20 S. Sup. Ct. 867; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100, 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232, 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79, 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U.S. 596, 599, 33 S. Sup. Ct. 605; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 304, 37 S. Sup. Ct. 643; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Sup. Ct. 264.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.

Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.