SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT, 248 U.S. 543 (1918)
U.S. Supreme Court
SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT , 248 U.S. 543 (1918)248 U.S. 543
Frederick R. SEARS et al.,
plaintiffs in error,
v.
INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF NAHANT, etc.
No. 61.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 23, 1918
Mr. Burton E. Eames, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error.
Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Arthur D. Hill, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error.
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1)
McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S.
168, 181, 19 S. Sup. Ct. 644; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann
Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S.
239, 243, 20 S. Sup. Ct. 867; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S.
712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S.
144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S.
89, 100, 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v.
Hanley, 205 U.S.
225, 232, 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S.
71, 79, 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct.
285; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co.,
228 U.S.
596, 599, 33 S. Sup. Ct. 605; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v.
Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S.
300, 304, 37 S. Sup. Ct. 643; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S.
255, 257, 38 S. Sup. Ct. 264.
U.S. Supreme Court
SEARS v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF NAHANT , 248 U.S. 543 (1918) 248 U.S. 543 Frederick R. SEARS et al., plaintiffs in error,v.
INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF NAHANT, etc.
No. 61.
Supreme Court of the United States December 23, 1918 Mr. Burton E. Eames, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. Robert G. Dodge and Arthur D. Hill, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants in error. PER CURIAM. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) McCain v. Des Moines, 174 U.S. 168, 181, 19 S. Sup. Ct. 644; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Ann Arbor R. R. Co., 178 U.S. 239, 243, 20 S. Sup. Ct. 867; Hull v. Burr, 234 U.S. 712, 720, 34 S. Sup. Ct. 892; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U.S. 144, 147, 36 S. Sup. Ct. 97; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U.S. 89, 100, 25 S. Sup. Ct. 727; Empire State-Idaho Mining Co. v. Hanley, 205 U.S. 225, 232, 27 S. Sup. Ct. 476; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71, 79, 29 S. Sup. Ct. 580; Brolan v. United States, 236 U.S. 216, 35 Sup. Ct. 285; (3) Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk, etc., R. Co., 228 U.S. 596, 599, 33 S. Sup. Ct. 605; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U.S. 300, 304, 37 S. Sup. Ct. 643; Bilby et al. v. Stewart, 246 U.S. 255, 257, 38 S. Sup. Ct. 264.
