Fisher v. Rule
Annotate this Case
248 U.S. 314 (1919)
U.S. Supreme Court
Fisher v. Rule, 248 U.S. 314 (1919)
Fisher v. Rule
Argued November 22, 1918
Decided January 7, 1919
248 U.S. 314
To initiate a right under the homestead act, a minor's application must show that he is the head of a family, and a general assertion that he is such by reason of having adopted a minor child, but without stating the time, place, or mode of adoption or identifying the child is insufficient for this purpose. P. 248 U. S. 317.
When the Secretary of the Interior, after canceling a final homestead entry, has ordered a suspension of all action under the decision
pending a reconsideration of it, no adverse right may be initiated under the homestead law either by settlement and improvement or by filing a preliminary application while the suspension remains in force. Id.
To fasten a trust on a patentee of public land, the plaintiff must show that the better right to the land is in himself; it is not enough to show that the patentee ought not to have received the patent. Id.
232 F. 861 affirmed.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.