Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. v. Yang-Tsze Ins. Assn.,
242 U.S. 430 (1917)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. v. Yang-Tsze Ins. Assn., 242 U.S. 430 (1917)

Furness, Withy & Company, Limited v.

Yang-Tsze Insurance Association

No. 106

Argued December 18, 19, 1916

Decided January 8, 1917

242 U.S. 430


Petitions for writs of certiorari are at the risk of the parties making them, and whenever in the progress of the cause facts develop which, if disclosed on the application, would have induced a refusal, the court may, upon motion by a party or ex mero motu dismiss the writ. Such petitions should be carefully prepared, contain appropriate references to the record, and present with studied accuracy, brevity, and clearness whatever is essential to ready and adequate understanding of points requiring the court's attention.

When the real situation is not set forth by the petition, a duty rests on opposing counsel to reveal it in their reply.

Writ of certiorari to review 215 F. 859 dismissed.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Page 242 U. S. 431

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.