Chin Fong v. Backus,
241 U.S. 1 (1916)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Chin Fong v. Backus, 241 U.S. 1 (1916)

Chin Fong v. Backus

No. 664

Argued April 5, 6, 1916

Decided April 17, 1916

241 U.S. 1


Where the right of a person of Chinese descent to enter this country depends, as in this case, upon the statutes regulating Chinese immigration, and not upon the construction of provisions of treaties relating thereto, a direct appeal will not lie to this Court under § 238, Jud.Code, from a judgment dismissing a petition for habeas corpus of a Chinese person detained for deportation.

The status of a Chinese merchant, as defined by the treaty with China of 1880, is that acquired in China, and not in this country.

The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this Court of appeals from the district court under § 238, Judicial Code, are stated in the opinion.

Page 241 U. S. 2

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.