Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. City of Akron,
240 U.S. 462 (1916)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. City of Akron, 240 U.S. 462 (1916)

Cuyahoga River Power Company v. City of Akron

No. 465

Argued October 20, 1915

Decided March 20, 1916

240 U.S. 462


As the bill in this case states that a municipality does not intend to institute proceedings to condemn, but does intend to take plaintiff's property rights without compensation, and has taken steps that will destroy such rights, and that, in so doing, it purports to be acting under an ordinance which violates the contract clause of, and the Fourteenth Amendment to, the federal Constitution, held that such municipal action is to be regarded as action of the state, and as the only way to determine whether plaintiff has rights that the municipality is bound to respect is to take jurisdiction and determine the case on the merits, the district court has jurisdiction.

The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the district court, are stated in the opinion.

Page 240 U. S. 463

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.