COON RAPIDS NAT BANK v. LEE, 239 U.S. 659 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court
COON RAPIDS NAT BANK v. LEE, 239 U.S. 659 (1916)
239 U.S. 659
COON RAPIDS NATIONAL BANK et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MAGGIE I. LEE,1 Executrix, etc.
No. 796.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1916
No appearance for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. A. B. Cummins and Mr. O. M. Brockett for defendant in error.
Docketed and dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Ninth Rule.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 Death of Anderville Lee suggested, and appearance of Maggie I. Lee, as party in error herein, filed and entered on January 10, 1916.
U.S. Supreme Court
COON RAPIDS NAT BANK v. LEE, 239 U.S. 659 (1916)
COON RAPIDS NATIONAL BANK et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MAGGIE I. LEE,1 Executrix, etc.
No. 796.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1916
No appearance for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. A. B. Cummins and Mr. O. M. Brockett for defendant in error.
Docketed and dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Ninth Rule.
Footnotes
Footnote 1 Death of Anderville Lee suggested, and appearance of Maggie I. Lee, as party in error herein, filed and entered on January 10, 1916.
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.