PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)
U.S. Supreme Court
PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)
70 S. Ct. 283 239 U.S. 635 60 L. Ed. 479
ROBERT M. PURCELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
QUAKER REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 152.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1916
Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.
Per Curiam:
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674, 42 L. Ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34, 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669, 670 S., 58 L. Ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161, 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624, 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45, 59 L. Ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50, 59 L. Ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]
U.S. Supreme Court
PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)
70 S. Ct. 283 239 U.S. 635 60 L. Ed. 479
ROBERT M. PURCELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
QUAKER REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 152.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1916
Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.
Per Curiam:
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674, 42 L. Ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34, 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669, 670 S., 58 L. Ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161, 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624, 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45, 59 L. Ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50, 59 L. Ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]
Justia Annotations is a forum for attorneys to summarize, comment on, and analyze case law published on our site. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship.