PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)

Syllabus

U.S. Supreme Court

PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916)

70 S. Ct. 283 239 U.S. 635 60 L. Ed. 479

ROBERT M. PURCELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
QUAKER REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 152.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 10, 1916

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674, 42 L. Ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34, 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669, 670 S., 58 L. Ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161, 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624, 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45, 59 L. Ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50, 59 L. Ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]



Opinions

U.S. Supreme Court

PURCELL v. QUAKER REALTY CO., 239 U.S. 635 (1916) 70 S. Ct. 283 239 U.S. 635 60 L. Ed. 479

ROBERT M. PURCELL et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
QUAKER REALTY COMPANY, LIMITED.
No. 152.

Supreme Court of the United States

January 10, 1916

Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. William Winans Wall for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U.S. 674, 42 L. Ed. 622, 18 Sup. Ct. Rep. 229; De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & T. Co. 233 U.S. 24, 34, 58 S. L. ed. 833, 837, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584; McDonald v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. 233 U.S. 665, 669, 670 S., 58 L. Ed. 1145, 1148, 1149, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 772; (2) Ross v. Oregon, 227 U.S. 150, 161, 57 S. L. ed. 458, 463, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 224; Moore-Mansfield Constr. Co. v. Electrical Installation Co. 234 U.S. 619, 624, 58 S. L. ed. 1503, 1505, 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 941; Willoughby v. Chicago, cago, 235 U.S. 45, 59 L. Ed. 123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 23; Cleveland & P. R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50, 59 L. Ed. 127, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 21.[ Purcell v. Quaker Realty Co. 239 U.S. 635 (1916) ]