Lesser v. Gray,
236 U.S. 70 (1915)

Annotate this Case
  • Syllabus  | 
  • Case

U.S. Supreme Court

Lesser v. Gray, 236 U.S. 70 (1915)

Lesser v. Gray

No. 110

Submitted December 9, 1914

Decided January 18, 1915

236 U.S. 70


Where plaintiff in error seasonably sets up and claims that, because the bankruptcy court adjudicated his debt to be not provable, the proceedings in bankruptcy and defendant's discharge are not a bar, a federal issue is raised, and as, in this case, that question is not frivolous, this Court has jurisdiction under § 237, Judicial Code.

A disallowed debt and a nonprovable debt are not identical, and a claim that has been presented and disallowed as not having foundation is not a nonprovable debt, and the discharge is a bar.

In this case, held that the contract on which the claim sued for was based was either terminated by defendant's bankruptcy or noncompliance therewith constituted a breach, and, in either case, defendant was released by his discharge.

As plaintiff, suing on a claim disallowed in the bankruptcy proceeding, made no effort to review the action of the bankruptcy court in the

Page 236 U. S. 71

direct way prescribed by the Bankruptcy Act, the result in this case cannot be obtained indirectly by suit in the state court based on the contention that the debt was nonprovable.

8 Ga.App. 605 affirmed.

The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this Court under § 237, Judicial Code, and the effect of a discharge in bankruptcy, are stated in the opinion.

Disclaimer: Official Supreme Court case law is only found in the print version of the United States Reports. Justia case law is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, verdicts or settlements. We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site or information linked to from this site. Please check official sources.